Imperiale Lebensweise im Widerstreit: Von ‚solidarischer Lebensweise‘ und ‚kritisch-emanzipatorischer Transformation‘
- Abstract
- Literatur
Einleitung
Brand, Ulrich (2005): Glokaler Widerstand: Die zapatistische Suche nach neuen Formen radikaler Politik. Ein Gespräch mit Ana Esther Ceceña und John Holloway. In: Ders. (Hrsg.): Gegen-Hegemonie. Perspektiven globalisierungskritischer Strategien. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag, 133-149.
Brand, Ulrich/Hirsch, Joachim (2005): Suchprozesse emanzipativer Politik. Resonanzen des Zapatismus in Westeuropa. In: Brand, Ulrich (Hrsg.): Gegen-Hegemonie. Perspektiven globalisierungskritischer Strategien. Hamburg: VSA- Verlag, 119-132.
Brand, Ulrich/Wissen, Markus (2017): Imperiale Lebensweise. Zur Ausbeutung von Mensch und Natur im globalen Kapitalismus. München: oekom. https://doi. org/10.3726/JP2017.21
Boyer, Miriam (2006): Solidarische Vergesellschaftung indigener Gemeinschaften in Chiapas, Mexiko. In: Altvater, Elmar/Sekler, Nicola (Hg.): Solidarische Ökonomie. Reader des wissenschaftlichen Beirats von Attac. Hamburg: VSA, 103-111.
Dorn, Felix Malte (2021): Inequalities in resource-based global production networks: resistance to lithium mining in Argentina (Jujuy) and Portugal (Região Norte). In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 37 (4), 70-91. https://doi. org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-37-4-70
Enlace Zapatista (2021): HAY UNA MUJER. Contra la destrucción de la Naturaleza. Austria, Viena. 24.9.2021. https://enlacezapatista.ezln.org. mx/2021/09/27/hay-una-mujer-contra-la-destruccion-de-la-naturaleza-aus- tria-viena/#:~:text=una%20peque%C3%B1a%20historia%3A-,Hay%20una%20 mujer.,ella%20habitan%20todos%20los%20modos, 26.4.2022.
Gilgenbach, Dominik/Moser, Bettina (2012): Lieber autonom als entwickelt? Zapatistische Autonomie als empirische Stütze des Post-Development? In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 28 (4), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-28-4-8
Hillenbrand, Leticia (2021): „Reise für das Leben“: Die EZLN-Delegation ist in Wien eingetroffen. In: Amerika21. https://amerika21.de/blog/2021/09/254139/ ezln-delegation-ist-wien-eingetroffen, 15.2.2022.
Kastner, Jens (2006): Rebellion, Revolte und Revolution überdenken. Kritische Einleitung in die zapatistisch inspirierte Theorie John Holloway. In: Holloway, John (2006): Die zwei Zeiten der Revolution. Würde, Macht und die Politik der Zapatistas. Wien: Turia + Kant, 7-36.
Kothari, Ashish (2022): The flower of transformation. Alternatives for justice, sustainability and equity. www.meer.com/en/68872-the-flower-of-transforma- tion, 14.4.2022.
Kerkeling, Luz (2003): ¡LA LUCHA SIGUE! – Der Kampf geht weiter. Münster: UNRAST-Verlag.
Krause-Solberg, Lea (2018): Die Zapatistas in Mexiko - Hoy decimos ¡basta!. Eine Analyse der Zapatistas als soziale Bewegung. Arbeitspapier 1/2018 der Forschungsstelle Kriege, Rüstung und Entwicklung, Universität Hamburg.
Landherr, Anna/Graf, Jakob (2021): Territoriale Macht und periphere imperiale Lebensweise – Internalisierungsmechanismen in der chilenischen Bergbaustadt Tierra Amarilla. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 37 (4), 44-69. https://doi. org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-37-4-44
ONU-DH – Naciones Unidas Derechos Humanos Oficina del Alto Comisio- nado México (2019): el proceso de consulta indígena sobre el Tren Maya no ha cumplido con todos los estándares internacionales de derechos humanos en la material. https://hchr.org.mx/comunicados/onu-dh-el-proceso-de-consulta- indigena-sobre-el-tren-maya-no-ha-cumplido-con-todos-los-estandares-inter- nacionales-de-derechos-humanos-en-la-materia, 15.4.2022.
Sáenz, Charlotte Maria (2015): Women up in arms. In: Pambazuka News. www.pambazuka.org/gender-minorities/women-arms, 14.4.2022.
Schmidinger, Thomas (2017): Krieg und Revolution in Syrisch-Kurdistan: Analysen und Stimmen aus Rojava. Wien: mandelbaum.
Seufert, Jonas/Siepmann, Marcel (2021). Geplante „Maya“-Bahn durch Mexiko: Ein gefährlicher Zug. In: taz. 21.8.2021. https://taz.de/Geplante-Maya-Bahn-durch- Mexiko/!5791061/, 15.2.2022.
Widersprüche der Bioökonomie. Extraktive Wissensproduktion und Landverhältnisse in Brasilien
- Abstract
- Literatur
- Keywords
Nationale Bioökonomie-Strategien haben einen Transformationsprozess von einer fossilen zu einer biomassebasierten Wirtschaft zum Ziel. Sie eint der Technikoptimismus, dass die sozialökologische Krise über technologische Entwicklungen überwunden werden kann. Aus den kritischen Perspektiven der Politischen Ökologie und der Political Economy of Research and Innovation (PERI) sind Technologien und technologische Innovationen keine neutralen Werkzeuge zur Problemlösung, sondern grundsätzlich gesellschaftlich situiert. Vor diesem Hintergrund kontextualisieren wir die technologischen Innovationen für eine klimafreundlichere Produktion von Ethanol auf Zuckerrohrbasis im Rahmen einer qualitativen Studie in Mato Grosso do Sul in Brasilien. Dabei gehen wir der Frage nach, welche Implikationen „klimafreundliche“ Technologien auf Landzugang und Landnutzung haben. Es wird deutlich, dass die Bioökonomie im Bereich Ethanol eine extraktive Wissensproduktion fördert, die die sozialökologischen Probleme der Agrarindustrie fortsetzt.
Abascal, Almudena/Karg, Silke/Kretschmer, Regine/Schaffrath-Rosario, Angelika/ Schweikert, Florian (2016): Brasilien: Der Kampf der Guarani-Kaiowá um Land und Würde. FIAN Fact Sheet 1. Köln. www.fian-berlin.de/wp-content/ uploads/files/2016-1_FS_Guarani_final_screen.pdf, 4.11.2021.
ABIEC (2020): Beef Report. Brazilian Livestock Profile. São Paulo. http://abiec. com.br/en/publicacoes/beef-report-2020-2/, 9.9.2021.
Agarwal, Bina (1998): The Gender and Environment Debate. In: Keil, Roger/Bell, David V.J./Penz, Peter/Fawcett, Leesa (Hg.): Political ecology. Global and local. London/New York: Routledge, 193-219.
Alimonda, Héctor (2011): La colonialidade de la naturaleza. Una aproximación a la ecología política latinoamericana. In: Alimonda, Héctor (Hg.): La naturaleza colonizada. Ecología política y minería en América Latina, Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 21-58.
Almeida, Rosemeire Aparecida de (2003): Identidade, distinção e territorialização. O processo de (re)criação camponesa no Mato Grosso do Sul. Dissertation. Universidade Estadual Paulista.
Assunção, Juliano/Pietracci, Breno/Souza, Priscila (2016): Fueling Development. Sugarcane Expansion Impacts in Brazil. https://climatepolicyinitiative.org/ wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Paper_Fueling_Development_Sugarcane_Expansion_Impacts_in_Brazil_Working_Paper_CPI.pdf.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Backhouse, Maria (2019): Agrarkraftstoffe. In: Brunner, Jan/Dobelmann, Anna/ Kirst, Sarah/Prause, Louisa (Hg.): Wörterbuch Land- und Rohstoffkonflikte. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839444337-004.
Backhouse, Maria (2020): The knowledge-based bioeconomy in the semi-periphery. A case study on second-generation ethanol in Brazil. Working Paper 13 der BMBF-Nachwuchsgruppe „Bioökonomie und soziale Ungleichheiten“. www.bioinequalities.uni-jena.de/sozbmedia/workingpaper13.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Backhouse, Maria (2021): Global Inequalities and Extractive Knowledge Production in the Bioeconomy. In: Backhouse, Maria/Lehmann, Rosa/Lorenzen, Kristina/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina /Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (Hg.): Bioeconomy and Inequalities. Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production across South America, Asia and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68944-5.
Backhouse, Maria/Lorenzen, Kristina/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina/Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (2017): Bioökonomie-Strategien im Vergleich. Gemeinsamkeiten, Widersprüche und Leerstellen. Bioeconomy and Inequalities Working Paper 1. Jena. www.bioinequalities.uni-jena.de/sozbemedia/neu/2017- 09-28+workingpaper+1.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Bemmann, Martin/Metzger, Birgit/Detten, Roderich von (2014): Einleitung. In: Metzger, Birgit/Bemmann, Martin/Detten, Roderich von (Hg.): Ökologische Modernisierung. Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 7-32. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845256948_11
Birch, Kean (2017): Innovation, Regional Development and the life science. Beyond clusters. London/New York: Routledge.
Blaikie, Piers M./Brookfield, H. C./Allen, Bryant James (1994): Land degradation and society. London/New York: Routledge.
Borges, Uta/Freitag, Heiko/Hurtienne, Thomas/Nitsch, Manfred (1984): PROAL- COOL. Analyse und Evaluierung des brasilianischen Biotreibstoffprogramms. Saarbrücken: Verlag Breitenbach.
Borras, Saturnino M./Franco, Jennifer C./Kay, Cristóbal/Spoor, Max (2011): Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean viewed from broader interna- tional perspectives. Rom. www.tni.org/files/download/borras_franco_kay__ spoor_land_grabs_in_latam__caribbean_nov_2011.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Brunner, Jan (2017): Die Verhandlungsmacht von Arbeiter*innen und Gewerkschaften in landwirtschaftlichen Transformationsprozessen: Eine Analyse des Zuckerrohrsektors im Bundesstaat São Paulo. GLOCON Working Paper Series 6. Berlin. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/199099, 9.9.2021.
Caliari, Tânia (2016): Adeus, Guyraroká. https://apublica.org/2016/09/adeus- guyraroka/, 9.9.2021.
Damasceno, Rita/Chiavari, Joana/Lopes, Cristina Leme (2017): Evolution of Land Rights in Rural Brasil. Framework for understanding, pathways for improvement. Rio de Janeiro. www.inputbrasil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Evolu- tion_of_Land_Rights_In_Rural_Brazil_CPI_FinalEN.pdf,9.9.2021.
Defante, Lilliane Renata/Vilpoux, Olivier François/Sauer, Leandro (2018): Rapid expansion of sugarcane crop for biofuels and influence on food production in the first producing region of Brazil. In: Food Policy 79, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.06.005
Domingues, Alex Torres (2017): A territorialização do capital canavieiro no Mato Grosso do Sul. O caso da Bunge em Ponta Porã/MS. Masterarbeit. Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados.
Elwert, Georg (2002): Feldforschung. Orientierungswissen und kreuzperspektivische Analyse. Sozialanthropologisches Arbeitspapier. Freie Universität Berlin. www.latautonomy.com/DE_FeldforschungNEU.PDF, 9.9.2021.
European Commission (2018): A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Brüssel. https://doi.org/10.2777/792130.
Fabrini, João E. (2008): A posse e concentracão de terra no sul de Mato Grosso do Sul. In: Almeida, Rosemeire Aparecida de (Hg.): A questão agrária em Mato Gross do Sul. Uma visão multidisciplinar. Campo Grande: UFMS, 53-79.
Fatheuer, Thomas (2019): Zuckerträume. Ethanol aus Brasilien in der globalen Klimapolitik. Berlin: FDCL. www.fdcl.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ FDCL_Zuckertra%CC%88ume_web.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Felix, Joel/Boydston, Rick/Burke, Ian C. (2011): Potato Response to Simulated Glyphosate Drift. In: Weed Technology 25 (4), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1614/ WT-D-11-00001.1
Fernandes, Bernardo Mançano (1999): Contribuição ao Estudo do Campesinato Brasileiro Formação e Territorialização do Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais sem Terra − MST (1979–1999). Dissertation. Universidade de São Paulo.
Giersdorf, Jens/Nitsch, Manfred (2006): Biodiesel in Brasilien − ein neues PROÁL-COOL oder Chance für den Nordosten? KAS-Länderberichte Focus Brasilien. www.kas.de/documents/252038/253252/7_dokument_dok_pdf_7949_1. pdf/1be38a01-9bfc-b9c7-c088-afa911989dd2?version=1.0&t=1539665577294, 9.9.2021.
Gudynas, Eduardo (2019): Extraktivismen. Erscheinungsformen und Nebenwirkungen. In: Ramírez, Martín/Schmalz, Stefan (Hg.): Extraktivismus. Lateinamerika nach dem Ende des Rohstoffbooms. München: oekom, 19-38.
Harding, Sandra G. (2011): Introduction: Beyond Postcolonial Theory: Two Under-theorized Perspectives on Science and Technology. In: Harding, Sandra G. (Hg.): The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393849-001
Harvey, Mark/Bharucha, Zareen P. (2016): Political Orientations, State Regulation and Biofuels in the Context of the Food-Energy-Climate Change Trilemma. In: Salles-Filho, Sergio Luiz Monteiro/Cortez, Luís Augusto Barbosa/da Silveira, José Maria F.J./Trindade, Sergio C. (Hg.): Global bioethanol. Evolution, risks, and uncertainties. London: Academic Press, 63-92. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803141-4.00003-4
Hatterman-Valenti, Harlene M. (2014): Simulated Glyphosate Drift to Potato Mother Plants and Effect on Daughter Tubers Used for Seed Production. In: Weed Technology 28 (1), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00107.1
Herrera, Selena/Wilkinson, John (2021): Sugar-Cane Bioelectricity in Brazil: Reinforcing the Meta-Discourses of Bioeconomy and Energy Transition. In: Backhouse, Maria/Lehmann, Rosa/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina/Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (Hg.): Bioeconomy and Inequalities. Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production across South America, Asia and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-68944-5_8
Hutchinson, Pamela J.S./Felix, Joel/Boydston, Rick (2014): Glyphosate Carryover in Seed Potato: Effects on Mother Crop and Daughter Tubers. In: American Journal of Potato Research 91 (4), 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013- 9363-7
IPCC (2019): Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse gas fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Summary for Policymakers. www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/08/Edited-SPM_Approved_Microsite_FINAL.pdf, 4.11.2021.
Jasanoff, Sheila (Hg., 2004): States of knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
Karatepe, Ismail Doga/Scherrer, Christoph/Tizzot, Henrique (2020): Das Mercosur-EU-Abkommen: Freihandel zu Lasten von Umwelt, Klima und Bauern. Wiesbaden. www.uni-kassel.de/einrichtungen/fileadmin/datas/einrich- tungen/icdd/2020-01-24_EUMercosurAbkommen_01.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Kleinschmit, Daniela/Lindstad, Berit Hauger/Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark/Toppinen, Anne/Roos, Anders/Baardsen, Sjur (2014): Shades of green. A social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector. In: Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (4), 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.921722
Lapola, David M./Schaldach, Ruediger/Alcamo, Joseph/Bondeau, Alberte/Koch, Jennifer/Koelking, Christina/Priess, Joerg A. (2010): Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biodiesel in Brazil. In: PNAS 107 (8), 3388- 3393. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907318107
Levidow, Les/Birch, Kean/Papaioannou, Theo (2012): Divergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation: The Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) as an R&D Agenda. In: Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (1), 94-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912438143
Lorenzen, Kristina (2019): Sugarcane Industry Expansion and Changing Land and Labor Relations in Brazil. The Case of Mato Grosso do Sul 2000–2016. Bioeconomy and Inequalities Working Paper 9. Jena. www.bioinequalities.uni-jena. de/sozbemedia/WorkingPaper9.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Lorenzi, Bruno Rossi (2018): Etanol de Segunda Geração no Brasil: política e trans-lações. Dissertation. Universidade Federal de São Carlos.
Lorenzi, Bruno Rossi/Andrade, Thales Haddad Novaes de (2019): O Etanol da segunda geração no Brasil: Políticas e redes sociotécnicas. In: Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 34 (100), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/3410014/2019
Mengel, Aléx Alexandre (2015): Modernização da agricultura e pesquisa no Brasil: a Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – EMBRAPA. Dissertation. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro.
Milanez, Artur Yabe/Souza, Jose Antonio P./Mancuso, Rafael (2017): Panoramas Setoriais 2030. Sucroenergético. Rio de Janeiro. web.bndes.gov.br/ bib/jspui/bitstream/1408/14245/2/Panoramas%20Setoriais%202030%20-%20 Sucroenegerg%c3%a9tico_P_BD.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Mintz, Sidney W. (1986): Sweetness and power. The place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin Books.
Miotto, Tiago (2018): Comunidade Guarani Kaiowá busca reverter no STF decisão que anulou demarcação. https://cimi.org.br/2018/09/comunidade-guarani- kaiowa-busca-reverter-no-stf-decisao-que-anulou-demarcacao/, 9.9.2021.
Mol, Arthur P.J./Spaargaren, Gert/Sonnenfeld, David A. (2014): Ecological Modernisation Theory: Where Do We Stand? In: Metzger, Birgit/Bemmann, Martin/Detten, Roderich von (Hg.): Ökologische Modernisierung. Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwis- senschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 35-66.
Moreno, Camila (2017): Landscaping a Biofuture in Latin America. Berlin: FDCL www.fdcl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FDCL_BIOEC_EN18072017-2. pdf, 9.9.2021.
Nardoque, Sedeval/Melo, Danilo Souza/Kudlavicz, Mieceslau (2018): Questão Agrária em Mato Grosso do Sul e seus Desdobramentos Pós-Golpe de 2016. In: OKARA: Geografia em debate 12 (2), 624-648. https://doi.org/10.22478/ ufpb.1982-3878.2018v12n2.41333
OECD (2009): The Bioeconomy to 2030. Designing a policy agenda. Paris. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264056886-en.pdf?expires=1611321448&id=id&accname=oid011481&checksum=441415F961CC3EA3F180EDD9BFB 79DC5, 9.9.2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056886-9-en
OECD/FAO (2018): Agricultural Outlook 2018−2027. Rome/Paris. www.fao.org/3/I9166EN/I9166EN.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Pavão, Eugênio Da Silva (2005): Formação, estrutura e dinâmica da economia do Mato Grosso do Sul no contexto das transformações da economia Brasileira. Florianópolis. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30382814.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Repórter Brasil (2014): As condições de trabalho no setor sucroalcooleiro. http:// reporterbrasil.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/26.-Folder_Sucroalcooleiro_ web_baixa.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Robbins, Paul (2012): Political ecology. A critical introduction. Malden, Mass.: J. Wiley-Blackwell.
Robles, Wilder (2018): Revisiting Agrarian Reform in Brazil, 1985–2016. In: Journal of Developing Societies 34 (1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0169796X17749658
Salina, Fernando Henriques/Almeida, Isabela Aroeira de/Bittencourt, Felipe Ribeiro (2020): RenovaBio Opportunities and Biofuels Outlook in Brazil. In: Sayigh, Ali (Hg.): Renewable Energy and Sustainable Buildings. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 18488-9_30
Salles-Filho, Sergio Luiz Monteiro (2016): Conclusions: Futures of Bioethanol − Main findings and prospects. In: Salles-Filho, Sergio Luiz Monteiro/Cortez, Luís Augusto Barbosa/Silveira, José Maria F.J. da/Trindade, Sergio C. (Hg.): Global bioethanol. Evolution, risks, and uncertainties. London: Academic Press, 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803141-4.00023-X
Sant’Anna, Ana Claudia/Shanoyan, Aleksan/Bergtold, Jason Scott/Caldas, Marcellus M./Granco, Gabriel (2016): Ethanol and sugarcane expansion in Brazil. What is fueling the ethanol industry? In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 19 (4), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.22434/ IFAMR2015.0195
Schildberger, Barbara/Hanak, Karel/Regner, Ferdinand (2007): Untersuchung von Herbizidschäden im österreichischen Weinbau. In: Gesunde Pflanzen 59 (1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-007-0142-6
Tittor, Anne (2021): Towards an Extractivist Bioeconomy? The Risk of Deepening Agrarian Extractivism when Promoting Bioeconomy in Argentina. In: Backhouse, Maria/Lehmann, Rosa/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina/ Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (Hg.): Bioeconomy and Inequalities. Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production across South America, Asia and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 309-329. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-68944-5_15
TNI/Hands on the Land (2015): The Bioeconomy. A primer. Transnational Insti- tute. www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/tni_primer_the_bioeconomy. pdf, 9.9.2021.
Tyfield, David/Lave, Rebecca/Randalls, Samuel/Thorpe, Charles (2017): Introduction. Beyond crisis in the knowledge economy. In: Tyfield, David/Thorpe, Charles/Lave, Rebecca/Randalls, Samuel (Hg.): The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science. London: Taylor and Francis, 1-18. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315685397-1
Umweltbundesamt (2017): Biomassekaskaden. Mehr Ressourceneffizienz durch Kaskadennutzung von Biomasse – von der Theorie zur Praxis. Dessau- Roßlau. www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publika- tionen/2017-06-13_texte_53-2017_biokaskaden_abschlussbericht.pdf, 9.9.2021.
USDA (2019): Brazil: Biofuels Annual. GAIN Report Number: BR19029. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Biofuels%20Annual_Sao%20Paulo%20ATO_Brazil_8-9-2019.pdf, 9.9.2021.
USDA (2020): Oilseeds and Products Annual. Brazil. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Oilseeds%20and%20Products%20Annual_Brasilia_Brazil_04-01-2020, 9.9.2021.
Wilkinson, John (2015): The Brazilian sugar alcohol sector in the current national and international conjuncture. Rio de Janeiro. http://actionaid.org.br/ wp-content/files_mf/1493419528completo_sugar_cane_sector_ing.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Wilkinson, John/Herrera, Selena (2008): Os agrocombustíveis no Brasil. Quais perspectivas para o campo? Brasília, DF. www.observatoriodoagronegocio.com. br/page41/files/AgroCBRPerspectivasNov08.pdf, 9.9.2021.
Wilkinson, John/Herrera, Selena (2010): Biofuels in Brazil: debates and impacts. In: Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (4), 749-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.20 10.512457
Winter, Rainer (2009): Cultural Studies. In: Flick, Uwe/Kardoff, Ernst von/Steinke, Ines (Hg.): Qualitative Forschung. 7. Auflage. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 204-212.
Yin, Robert K. (2009): Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 4. Auflage. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.
Bioökonomie, extraktive Wissensproduktion, Bioenergie, Landzugang, Brasilien
The Imperial Mode of Living: (Re)conceptualising Unequal North-South Relations
- Abstract
- Literatur
Dialogue
Acosta, Alberto/Brand, Ulrich (2018): Radikale Alternativen. Warum man den Kapitalismus nur mit vereinten Kräften überwinden kann. München: oekom.
Aricó, José (2014): Marx and Latin America. Historical Materialism Book Series. Leiden: Brill.
Backhouse, Maria/Lorenzen (2022): Widersprüche der Bioökonomie. Extraktive Wissensproduktion und Landverhältnisse im brasilianischen Zucker-Bioenergie-Sektor. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 38 (1), 13-39.
Beck, Hanno (2014): Behavioral Economics. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer. Beigel, Fernanda (2015): Das Erbe des lateinamerikanischen Dependentismo und die Aktualität des Begriffs der Abhängigkeit. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 31 (3), 11-38. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-31-3-11
Bosi, Alfredo (2015): Brazil and the Dialectic of Colonization. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Brand, Ulrich/Wissen, Markus (2017): Imperiale Lebensweise. Zur Ausbeutung von Mensch und Natur im globalen Kapitalismus. München: oekom. https://doi.org/10.3726/JP2017.21
Braudel, Fernand (1980): The Structures of Everyday Life. The Limits of the Possible. New York: Harber & Row.
Crutzen, Paul (2002): Geology of mankind. Nature 415 (3), 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
De la Garza Toledo (2021, Ed.): Crítica de la razón neocolonial. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: CLACSO; CEIL-CONICET; México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; Querétaro: Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.
Dorn, Felix (2021): Inequalities in resource-based global production networks: resistance to lithium mining in Argentina (Jujuy) and Portugal (Regiao Norte). In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 37 (4), 70-91.
Dussel, Enrique (2012): 1492. El encubrimiento del otro. Obras Selectas XIX. Buenos Aires: Docenia.
Escobar, Arturo (2004): Beyond the Third World. Imperial Globality, Global Coloniality and Anti-Globalisation Social Movements. In: Third World Quarterly 25 (1), 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185417
Escobar, Arturo (2012): Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi. org/10.1515/9781400839926
Fischer-Kowalski, Marina/Haberl, Helmut (2015): Social metabolism: a metric for biophysical growth and degrowth. In: Martinez-Alier, Joan/Muradian, Roldan (Ed.): Handbook of Ecological Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 100-138. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471416.00009
Frank, Andre Gunder (1991): The Underdevelopment of Development. Stockholm: Bethany Books.
Herman, Edwards/Chomsky, Noam (1994): Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. London: Vintage Books.
Herrera, Amílcar O./Scolnik, Hugo D./Chichilnisky, Graciela/Gallopin, Gilberto C./Hardoy, Jorge E./Mosovich, Diana/Oteiza, Enrique/ de Romero Brest, Gilda L./Suárez, Carlos E./Talavera, Luis (1977): ¿Catástrofe o nueva sociedad?. Bogotá: Centro Internacional de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo.
Hornborg, Alf (1998): Towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: artic- ulating world system theory and ecological economics. In: Ecological Economics 25 (1), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00100-6
Kothari, Ashish/Salleh, Ariel/Escobar, Arturo/Demaria, Federico/Acosta, Alberto (2019): Pluriverse. A post-development dictionary. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
Kuhn, Thomas (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lander, Edgardo (2000, Ed.): La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Leff, Enrique (2008): Discursos sustentables. Mexico City: Siglo XXI.
Maldonado-Torres, Nelson (2007): On the Coloniality of Being. In: Cultural Studies 21 (2/3), 240-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548
Lessenich, Stephan (2016): Neben uns die Sintflut. Die Externalisierungsgesells- chaft und ihr Preis. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Marcuse, Herbert (1969): Versuch über die Befreiung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Mariátegui, José Carlos (1971): Seven Interpretative Essays on Peruvian Reality. Austin: University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/701151
Marini, Ruy Mauro (1972): Brazilian sub-imperialism. In: Monthly Review 23 (9), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-023-09-1972-02_2
Misculin, Nicolas (2021): Argentine president says Brazilians ‘came from the jungle’, sparking uproar. In: Reuters. www.reuters.com/world/americas/argentine-pres- ident-says-brazilians-came-jungle-sparking-uproar-2021-06-09/, 26.11.2021.
Moore, Jason W. (2016, Ed.): Anthropocene or Capitalocene. Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: PM Press.
Maranón Pimentel, Boris (2017): La colonialidad del trabajo. In: Controversias y Concurrencias Latinoamericanas 9 (15), 20-36.
Pimmer, Stefan/Schmidt, Lukas (2015, Ed.): Dependenztheorien Reloaded. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 31 (3), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.20446/ JEP.201531
Prebisch, Raul (1950): The economic development of Latin America and it`s prin- cipal problems. Economic Commission for Latin America. United Nations Publication.
Quijano, Anibal (1973): Redefinicion de la dependencia y proceso de marginaliza- cion social. In: Weffort, Francisvo/Quijano, Anibal (eds.): Populismo, marginalizacion y dependencia. Ensayos de interpretacion sociologica, San Jose: Universidad Centroamericana, 180-213.
Quijano, Anibal (2014): Cuestiones y horizontes. Antologia esencial. De la dependencia historicoestructural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder, seleccion y prologo a cargo de Danilo Asssis Climaco. Coleccion Antologias, CLASCO.
Quijano, Aníbal (2016): Kolonialität der Macht. Eurozentrismus und Lateinamerika. Wien/Berlin: Turia + Kant.
Rinke, Kuno (1997): Zur Geschichte des Begriffs und der Theorie von der Arbeiteraristokratie in der europäischen Arbeiterbewegung. Lausanne: Peter Lang.
Sachs, Wolfgang (1984) Die Liebe zum Automobil. Ein Rückblick in die Geschichte unserer Wünsche. Hamburg: Rowohlt, Reinbek.
Truman, Harry (1949): Inaugural Address. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/truman.asp, 7.12.2021.
An Ongoing Conquest – Confronting the Expansion of Capitalism in Indigenous Documentary Films
- Abstract
- Literatur
- Keywords
This article explores the relation between indigenous filmmaking and conflict due to expanding extractive industries in Latin America, and the documentary film potential to create new understandings of these situations. It specifically engages with two indigenous documentaries that focus on current territorial conflicts and environmental injustice: Júba Wajiín – Resistencia en la Montaña de Guerrero (2018) and Sangre y Tierra (2016). The article argues that these films enable a confrontation with current global modes of production, by articulating the expansion of capitalism as a process of increasing destruction, as an ongoing conquest
Barad, Karen (2003): Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. In: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (3), 801-830. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
Brand, Ulrich/Wissen, Markus (2018): The limits to capitalist nature. Theorizing and overcoming the imperial mode of living. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield international.
Danowski, Déborah/Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo (2017): The ends of the world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
De la Cadena, Marisol/Starn, Orin (2007): Indigenous Expierence today. Oxford: Berg.
Dowell, Kristin (2006): Indigenous Media Gone Global. Strengthening Indigenous Identity On- and Offscreen First Nations/Features Film Showcase. In: American Anthropologist 108 (2), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.2.376
Ginsburg, Fay (1993): Aboriginal Media and the Australian Imaginary. In: Public Culture 5 (3), 557-558. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-5-3-557
Gräf, Dennis/Großmann, Stephanie/Klimczak, Peter, Krah, Hans/Wagner, Marietheres (2017): Filmsemiotik. Eine Einführung in die Analyse audio-visueller Formate. Marburg: Schüren.
Iovino, Serenella/Oppermann, Serpil (2014): Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington/ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Kaplan, Ann (1997): Looking for the Other: Feminism, Film and the Imperial Gaze. New York: Routledge.
La Sandía digital (2020): Júba Wajiín - Sinopsis. https://lasandiadigital.org. mx/2020/09/28/juba-wajiin/, 01.08.2021.
Magallanes-Blanco, Claudia (2014): Talking About Our Mother: Indigenous Videos on Nature and the Environment. In: Communication, Culture, & Critique 8 (2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12084
Mignolo, Walter (2012): Local Histories/Global Designs. Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Woodstock: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691156095.001.0001
Murray, Stuart (2008): Images of Dignity. Barry Barclay and Fourth Cinema. Wellington: Huia Publishers.
Oppermann, Serpil (2016): From Material to Posthuman Ecocriticism: Hybridity, Stories, Nature. In: Zapf, Hubert (ed.): Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology. Berlin: de Gruyter, 273-294. https://doi. org/10.1515/9783110314595-016
Pertierra, Anna Cristina/Salazar, Juan Francisco/Valdez, Sebastián Martín (2020): Media Cultures in Latin America. An Introduction. In: Pertierra, Anna Cristina/Salazar, Juan Francisco (eds.): Media Cultures in Latin America. Key Concepts and New Debates. New York: Routledge, 1-21. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780429425127-1
Prins, Harald (2008): Visual Anthropology. In: Biolsi, Thomas (ed.): A companion to the anthropology of American Indians. Williston: Wiley, 506-525. https:// doi.org/10.1002/9780470996270.ch27
Pueblo Nasa (2017): Libertad y alegría con Uma Kiwe. Palabra del Proceso de Liberación de la Madre Tierra. https://liberaciondelamadretierra.org/ wp-content/uploads/2017/04/liberacion_madre_tierra.pdf, 14.08.2021.
Rony, Fatimah (1996): The third eye. Race, Cinema, and ethnographic spectacle. Durham/NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822398721
Salazar, Juan Francisco/Córdova, Amalia (2020): Indigenous Media Cultures in Abya Yala. In: Pertierra, Anna Cristina/Salazar, Juan Francisco (eds.): Media Cultures in Latin America. Key Concepts and New Debates. New York: Rout- ledge, 128-146. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429425127-8
Sanjínes, Iván (2013): Usando el audiovisual como una estrategia de sobrevivencia y de lucha, de creación de un imaginario propio. In: Revista Chilena de Antropología Visual 21, 32-50.
Schiwy, Freya (2009): Indianizing Film. Decolonization, the Andes, and the Ques- tion of Technology. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Svampa, Maristella (2019): Neo-Extractivism in Latin America. Socio-environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108752589
Vargas Reyes, Bryan/Ariza Santamaría, Rosembert (2019): Liberación de la madre tierra: entre la legitimidad y los usos sociales de la ilegalidad. In: Revista Socio- Jurídicos 22 (1), 203-231. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/ sociojuridicos/a.7641
Wilson, Pamela/Stewart, Michelle (2008): Introduction: Indigeneity and Indigenous Media on the Global Stage. In: Wilson, Pamela/Stewart, Michelle (eds.): Global Indigenous Media. Cultures, Poetics, and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388692-001
Zamorano, Gabriela (2009): Reimagining politics. Video and indigenous struggles in contemporary Bolivia. Michigan: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Keywords Indigenous film, documentary, Latin American film, land conflicts, capitalism